The ALOA model is based on the book A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (Anderson, L.W., D.R. Krathwohl, and B.S.T.o.e.o. Complete ed. 2001, New York ; London: Longman. xxix, 352 p). This book provides information on how to write clear Learning Outcomes.
The main structure of a learning outcome is a verb and an object. The verb is related with the cognitive process that the students will have to achieve and demonstrate. The noun is generally related with the knowledge students are expected to acquire or construct or use.
Writing a good Learning Outcome means writing a clear Learning Outcome. The Learning Outcomes should help the teacher define what they will teach and how they will structure the pedagogic activities, including assessment. But, the Learning Outcomes should also be clear to students and for the institutions.
One fundamental part of writing a clear Learning Outcome is that it should be focused on the student and what he/she should be able to do after a learning event, instead of the content that he/she should know.
Another important feature of a good Learning Outcome is that the verb it uses should be specific and measurable. Verbs like Understand or Apply can be too general for learning Outcomes. Instead, using verbs like comparing or explaining make the teaching and learning process more transparent. Using clear and measurable verbs is very important when defining learning outcomes at the level of the lesson or module.
You can find more ideas on how to write Learning outcomes in the following links:
- A MODEL OF LEARNING OBJECTIVES based on A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives
- Writing and Using Learning Outcomes: a Practical Guide, Declan Kennedy, Áine Hyland, Norma Ryan
- A Guide to Developing Measurable Student Learning Outcomes
- Teaching for Quality Learning at University, John Biggs
Cognitive processes (adapted from Anderson et al)
Remember category
Categories and cognitive processes | Alternative names | Definition |
1. Remember | Retrieve relevant knowledge from long-term memory | |
1.1 Recognizing | Identifying | Locating knowledge in long-term memory that is consistent with presented material |
1.2 Recalling | Retrieving | Retrieving relevant knowledge from long-term memory |
Understand category
Categories and cognitive processes | Alternative names | Definition |
2. Understand | Construct meaning from instructional messages, including oral, written, and graphic communication | |
2.1 Interpreting | Clarifying, paraphrasing, representing, translating | Changing from one form of representation to another |
2.2 Exemplifying | Illustrating, instantiating | Finding a specific example or illustration of a concept or principle |
2.3 Classifying | Categorizing, subsuming | Determining that something belongs to a category |
2.4 Summarizing | Abstracting, generalizing | Abstracting a general theme or a major point |
2.5 Inferring | Concluding, extrapolating, interpolating, predicting | Drawing a logical conclusion from presented information |
2.6 Comparing | Contrasting, mapping, matching | Detecting correspondences between two ideas, objects an the like |
2.7 Explaining | Constructing models | Constructing a cause-and-effect model of a system |
Apply category
Categories and cognitive processes | Alternative names | Definition |
3. Apply | Carry out or use a procedure in a given situation | |
3.1 Executing | Carrying out | Applying a procedure to a familiar task |
3.2 Implementing | Using | Applying a procedure to an unamiliar task |
Analyse category
Categories and cognitive processes | Alternative names | Definition |
4. Analyse | Break material into its constituent parts and determine how the parts relate to one another and to an overall structure | |
4.1 Differentiating | Discriminating, distinguishing, focusing, selecting | Distinguishing relevant from irrelevant parts or important from unimportant parts of presented material |
4.2 Organizing | Finding coherence, integrating, outlining, parsing, structuring | Determining how elements fit or function within a structure |
4.3 Attributing | Deconstructing | Determining a point of view, bias, values, or intent underlying presented material |
Evaluate category
Categories and cognitive processes | Alternative names | Definition |
5. Evaluate | Make judgments based on criteria and standards | |
5.1 Checking | Coordinating, detecting, monitoring, testing | Detecting inconsistencies or fallacies within a process or product; determining whether a process or product has internal consistency; detecting the effectiveness of a procedure as it is being implemented |
5.2 Critiquing | Judging | Detecting inconsistencies between a product and external criteria, determining whether a product has external consistency; detecting the appropriateness of a procedure for a given problem |
Create category
Categories and cognitive processes | Alternative names | Definition |
6. Create | Put elements together to form a coherent or functional whole; reorganize elements into a new pattern or structure. | |
6.1 Generating | Hypothesizing | Coming up with an alternative hypothesis based on criteria |
6.2 Planning | Designing | Devising a procedure for accomplishing some task |
6.3 Producing | Constructing | Inventing a product |